Gerald Cole Author, journalist and screenwriter
Gerald Cole Author, journalist and screenwriter

Alternative methods of construction

Today I’m going to talk about alternative methods of construction, of which there are probably more around now than ever before. I’ll go into the reasons for that in a minute.


But first it’s worth asking why we should consider alternative methods of building  in the first place?


Well, the great majority of selfbuilders aren’t hugely experienced at major projects. I certainly wasn’t with my self build.


So I did what most self builders do which is to hire an architect and a contractor to do the bulk of the work for me. After all, they’re the professionals. If they don’t know the best way to build something who does?


The only problem with that is that most professionals are like the rest of us. We have a preferred way of doing things, a method we have most experience of and find most convenient. Chances are that’s going to be the method a professional will recommend to you. And it may well be exactly what you need. But it might not be.


Given the nature of building, it can be years before you find that out, usually when you come to carry out a major repair or renovation. As a result, it may turn out to be a lot more expensive, or troublesome, than you anticipated.


So, even if you’re convinced you know exactly what form of construction you want, it’s always worth spending a little time looking at the alternatives. At worst, you’ll waste a few hours. At best, you may find it makes a dramatic difference to your project, and its costs.


So what does traditional building involve? To today’s house building industry it means brick and block. 


On the continent they say the British build houses twice. First we put up an inner wall of concrete blocks. This does all the hard work of holding up the floors and the roof and providing the main structural support.


Then we cover this up with an outer wall of brick which provides protection from the weather. But it’s mainly designed to look good and give the house its distinctive character.


Between the walls is a cavity, typically about 100 millimetres – or four inches – wide. Originally it was intended to allow any moisture seeping through the brickwork to drain away, leaving the inner wall dry. Nowadays, depending on where you live, it’s either filled or part-filled with insulation, designed to keep the house warm and reduce fuel bills.


Bar the insulation, this is pretty much how we’ve been building houses for the best part of a century. Everyone in the building industry is familiar with it. The materials are available everywhere. And it’s still the cheapest way of building, at least in terms of material costs.


So why should we consider anything else?


Well, three main reasons. The first, and most important, is energy efficiency.


Fuel prices, with a few hiccups, have been rising steadily since the 1970s and show no sign of slowing down. The government has responded to that by upgrading the Building Regulations which now require new houses to be better insulated and more airtight than ever before.


That’s certainly the most efficient way of reducing the amount of gas and electricity we use. But traditional building, as we know it, was never intended to accommodate such large amounts of insulation or be so draught-free.


I remember going round a thirties property a few years ago with a surveyor who was delighted to find fierce draughts roaring through the empty cavity and under the suspended ground floor.


As far as he was concerned the house was in superb condition because it was so well ventilated. Damp or rot would never be a problem and the 70-year-old floor timbers, once we’d exposed them, looked brand new. This was great for the house, but not so good for anyone living in it. In wintertime it was absolutely freezing and heating cost a fortune.


Building a house in the same way today but to modern standards can create real problems. For example, if you wanted to use the cheapest insulation – fibre glass or mineral wool – the cavity would have to be at least 150 millimetres – or 6 inches – wide.


Add the depth of the brickwork, blockwork and internal plaster and the total depth would come to around 380 millimetres – around 15 inches. And even then, your local building control department might require additional insulation on the internal side of the wall.


Meanwhile, the cheapest way to insulate the roof would involve laying around a foot of mineral wool on the loft floor, making the loft completely unusable as accommodation or storage space.


If you want to build an ultra-energy efficient house, the walls would need to be even wider. The Denby Dale house, built four years ago, in Yorkshire was the first traditionally built house in Britain to achieve the passivhaus standard.


This is the best known method of building very low energy houses where the annual heating bill can be as low as £80. But it was developed in Germany where most houses are either timber frame or built with solid walls without a cavity.


The Denby Dale house ended up with a cavity around 12 inches wide, packed with fibre glass. The total width of its walls, which were stone on the outside, was over 500 millimetres, getting on for a couple of feet.


If you have a small plot, or the space for your extension is restricted, walls approaching that width will really squeeze the internal space. And you’ll be wasting a significant amount of the cash you’ve paid for the land.


There are solutions, of course. You can use more efficient forms of insulation, typically rigid foam polyurethane produced by companies like Kingspan and Celotex. This is around twice as thermally efficient as mineral wool but around three times the price.


Another common solution is to build the inner walls with aircrete, which is a kind of Aero chocolate bar version of standard concrete blocks.


Aircrete blocks are full of tiny air bubbles, which makes them much more thermally efficient. But they are more expensive than standard blocks and likely to become even more so because there’s currently a shortage.


And achieving high standards of airtightness in a brick and block house depends on skilfully and accurately applied plasterwork.


The point is that sticking with traditional methods is a lot more complicated than it used to be and it’s harder to get right. But many of the alternative methods now available were developed to deal with today’s energy efficiency standards and they could make your build much easier.


The second reason to look at alternatives is the question of labour costs. Since the 2008 recession it’s estimated that over 140,000 workers have left the building industry. Traditional building depends on skilled tradespeople, particularly bricklayers, carpenters, joiners and plumbers. But around a quarter in the UK are now over 50 and, thanks to the boom and bust nature of building, there hasn’t been enough investment in their replacements.


As a result it’s getting harder to find skilled craftsmen and, when you do find them, their wages are rising. I don’t know what it’s like in the west country but in parts of the south east, where I live, bricklayers are asking and getting up to £300 a day.


Many alternative methods of building are specifically designed to need fewer skills. Some are effectively do-it-yourself, at least in part, and these are particularly useful to selfbuilders on a limited budget.


Reason number three for considering alternatives is speed – not just a faster speed of building, which will save on your labour costs, but the speed at which your new house becomes properly habitable.


Traditional brick and block houses are literally hand built – each block and brick laid individually. It can take up to six months to complete a build and, until the roof goes on, everything takes place in the open air.


If it gets too cold to pour concrete or lay mortar, all work stops. If the weather’s wet, the block and brickwork can become saturated. Once completed, it can take a new house up to a year to dry out fully.


So what’s the alternative?


The most well established is timber frame. It accounts for about 20 per cent of the UK house building market as a whole, and 60 per cent in Scotland.


In a timber frame, it’s timber studwork not concrete blocks that holds everything up. Even though the studs are comparatively slim, they are braced by sheets of plywood or OSB which gives them more than enough strength to hold up a house.


Timber frame is popular because it eliminates many of the drawbacks of brick and block.


For a start, timber is inherently more thermally efficient than masonry. Not only that, because the frame is hollow, insulation can be fitted inside. It doesn’t have to be squeezed into the cavity. So the total depth of the wall can be kept down.


Timber frame is also easier to make airtight than brick and block. To prevent moisture produced inside the house from reaching the timber and causing it to rot, a vapour barrier – usually taped sheets of polythene – is attached to the inside of the frame before it’s drylined with plasterboard.


Even more importantly, time on site is reduced because most timber frames are built in a factory under controlled conditions. This allows the dimensions to be much more precise than with a traditional build and gives much greater control over costs and build quality. There’s much less chance of a subcontractor covering up a mistake because he’s in a hurry to get to his next job.


The main structure is delivered to the site on the back of a lorry and it’s erected within a few days. As soon as the roof is on, the internal trades can start work while the outside shell is being built.


If it’s properly organised, the whole build process can be completed within 12 to 14 weeks, much quicker than brick and block. Even better, it’s a largely dry process. All the internal walls are plasterboarded, ready for immediate decoration, so there’s no lengthy drying out period after completion.


A timber frame house will also be lighter than a masonry one, so, depending on your ground conditions, you may be able to save costs on the foundations. Or you can save even more time by using mini-piles or helical screwpiles, which are simply driven into the ground, eliminating the need for large scale excavations


Like all systems, however, timber frame isn’t perfect. Because the frame is a single, precision-made shell, last minute changes veyr difficult to make.


And if you’re going to hang heavy objects, like kitchen wall units or wide-screen TVs on the plasterboard walls, the studwork will need to be braced internally to provide the extra support. So you need to think about that before the plasterboard goes up.


But many of the most recent developments in timber frame are ironing out these problems. Instead of completing the frame on site, more and more is being prefabricated, largely to meet the demands of ever rising energy efficiency standards.


In so-called ‘closed panel’ systems all the insulation, vapour barriers, external waterproofing and even plasterboard is put together in storey-high panels in the factory. Then these are simply slotted together on site.


Some systems do this with entire walls, with doors, windows, wiring and plumbing all factory-fitted, saving even more time on site. This is much more common in Scandinavia and Germany with companies like Scandia-Hus, Huf Haus and Baufritz, who now operate over here, and it makes an enormous difference to overall build quality.


But perhaps the ultimate technical development, at least for the moment, is the structural insulated panel, or SIP.


SIPs simplify the construction process even further by combining the insulation and the structure. A SIP panel consists of a layer of rigid foam insulation – usually polyurethane or expanded polystyrene – glued between two sheets of oriented strand board.


Unlikely as it sounds, this makes it enormously strong – in fact, up to six times as strong as a standard timber frame.


Building a SIP house involves simply glueing and nailing one ceiling-high panel to another until a complete storey is made. The panels form a completely self-supporting shell so the entire space inside can be open plan, if you choose.


SIPs can also make roof panels which don’t need internal support. They simply lean together to make the roof shape, with at most a single horizontal beam joining them. This makes them ideal for rooms in the roof.


But it’s as insulation where SIPs really score. Because the insulation inside each panel is pressed against the next a continuous airtight barrier is created. This makes a really big difference in avoiding heat loss. A recent German study showed that a gap as small as one millimetre gap between sheets of insulation can make them up to 40 per cent less efficient. 


So, if you really to need to have the slimmest possible walls for your project, SIPs are hard to beat. They’re also a good choice if you’re planning to build an ultra-energy efficient house.


There’s one other type of timber frame which should also be included, even though it’s actually much more traditional than brick and block. And that’s oak frame, built in the way oak framed buildings were constructed from the middle ages to Tudor times with exposed beams, high vaulted roofs and mortice and tenon joints fixed with hand-crafted wooden pegs.


It’s all very nostalgic and very organic – most systems use green oak, which has been felled in the last 18 months, so that, like brick and block, it will need to dry out after completion. This also means the oak will shrink, providing all the cracks and splits which give this wood its distinctive character.


That creates problems for external elements like windows and doors which don’t shrink, so a degree of flexibility is built in. But to meet current Building Regulations most oak frames are now either enclosed within an insulated shell covered with brick or timber cladding, so the oak frame is only exposed on the inside, or only part of the frame is exposed internally. It still looks marvellous, but it’s an expensive option.


Now if you really want to save money there are systems which are virtually do-it-yourself – at least, in part – and you won’t need to re-train as a carpenter or bricklayer.


Probably the best known is Insulated Concrete Formwork or ICF. Concrete is more commonly used for commercial buildings where walls are made by pouring readymix into wall-shaped forms usually made of wood. Once the concrete has set the forms are removed.


With ICF the forms are made of polystyrene, either as separate blocks or panels which are assembled on site. They’re designed to clip together, like giant Lego bricks, so building a wall is literally child’s play. Once a storey has been finished, the forms are filled with ready mixed concrete, the concrete sets and that’s that. The forms stay where they are, creating permanent and very effective insulation, inside and out. You then move onto the next storey.


The forms come in a variety of shapes and thicknesses to accommodate virtually any design. Typically they are covered on the outside with a polymer render which is flexible so it won’t crack.


As well as being exceptionally energy efficient, ICF has excellent acoustic properties. I know of one selfbuilding couple who chose the system because they wanted to accommodate both a music room and an elderly relative who was particularly sensitive to noise.


The one skill that is essential for ICF, however, is expert concrete pouring, which is usually done with a pump. Get it wrong and the concrete could end up distorting the forms or even bursting through them. So look for a concrete pump operator who’s used the system before.


But if all this sounds a little hi-tech, there’s another formwork system which is equally hands-on but demands even fewer skills. Durosil lays claim to be the original ICF system. It was invented in Switzerland in 1937 but only reached here in 2008.


It’s an interlocking block but instead of plastic it’s made of a kind of fossilized wood. Essentially it’s wood waste which has been soaked in a solution of pure cement dust.


The result is a block that’s as strong as concrete but lighter and  as thermally efficient as timber. You can cut it like timber and suspend heavy objects from using only woodscrews.


Inside it has two hollow spaces, an inner-facing one where the concrete is poured and an outer one filled with polyurethane insulation. The concrete can be poured by pump or by hand and because of the porous nature of the material a very runny mixture can be used. That means pouring can take place in low temperatures that halt conventional block and brick laying.


Durosil’s currently targeting selfbuilders and staging regular training days for free. You get a chance to build a wall and learn a lot. I’ve done it and I can recommend it. It’s a lot of fun.


Finally, if you're committed to the idea of a house built of baked clay but you still want to save time and labour costs on bricklaying there's an alternative that's been popular in Europe for many years. It's called honeycomb clay blockwork.


The blocks slot together end to end, so they only need to be fixed to each other horizontally. The fixing is done with a thin glue-like mortar which is applied with a hand-held mahcine, requiring minimal skill.


It's a fast, virtually dry system and the blocks can filled with insulation for maximum thermal efficiency. If you want to see how effective it can be go to the Prince's Foundation website, which features a house the Foundation built using this method at the British Research Establishment in Hertfordshire. There's a video tour with Kirstie Allsop (


Honeycomb clay blockwork, however, is mainly being pushed in this country by brickmakers Wienerberger with their Porotherm system.


All the systems I’ve talked about so far have all the necessary certification required by building control, so if you choose one you shouldn’t have any trouble getting approval. That’s not to say you won’t. Local authority Building Control departments aren’t always as open-minded as they should be. In which case there are around 60 approved inspectors who, in my experience, tend to be more flexible with unfamiliar systems.


The one thing I haven’t mentioned is pricing, except to say that on material costs alone all these systems are likely to be more expensive than brick and block. But it’s important to remember that material costs are only part of your overall budget.


The extra you pay on it could easily be recouped by savings elsewhere – on labour, on scaffolding, equipment hire, foundations and so on. You really need to look at the big picture to judge these systems fairly.


Finally, the golden rule on any non-traditional system is to find a contractor who’s used it before and is enthusiastic about it. Don’t assume a run-of-the-mill jobbing builder can simply pick it up.


Chances are he’ll make his beginner’s mistakes with you. But it’s much more likely that he either won’t take on the work or he’ll the whack the price up.


I’ve only had time to touch on the major alternatives, but I hope I’ve wetted your appetite. Good luck with your projects, whichever system you use. 



Suppliers of alternative methods of construction

Timber Frame suppliers

Dan-Wood  01242 695  056

Potton  01767 676 400

Scandia-Hus  01342 838 060

Scotframe  01803 267 680


Structural Insulated Panel suppliers

Kingspan TEK System  01544 386 601

SBS Sip Building Systems 0151 420 1404

Sips UK  01933 353 501 

Sips Industries 01383 823 995


Oak Frame

Border Oak  01568 708 752

Carpenter Oak and Woodland  01225 743 089

Oakwrights  01432 357 733

Welsh Oak  01686 688 000.


Insulating Concrete Formwork

Beco Wallform  01652 653 844

Insulating Concrete Formwork  Association  01403 701 167

Nudura  01822 890 251

Polysteel Warmerwall  01242 692 335


Durosil  01495 249 400


Honeycomb clay blockwork

Wienerberger  0161 491 8200


Contact me

You can reach me on:


020 8780 2844


Or you are welcome to use the contact form.


Build Your Own Brick House (Crowood 2013)

Superstition (Ebury Press, 1990)

Gregory's Girl (W.H. Allen, 1981)

Any Which Way You Can (W.H. Allen, 1983)

Clint Eastwood (W.H. Allen, 1983)

Comfort & Joy (Methuen, 1984)

Sid and Nancy



Print Print | Sitemap
© Gerald Cole

This website was created using 1&1 MyWebsite.